*news embed full width*
Freedom
June 27, 2018

U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Religious Freedom for Pregnancy Centers

U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Religious Freedom for Pregnancy Centers

June 27, 2018
By
Staff Writer
Freedom
June 27, 2018

U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Religious Freedom for Pregnancy Centers

The United States Supreme Court’s decision on June 24, 2018 is a victory for pro-life pregnancy centers, granting them the right to offer life-saving options to pregnant women without being forced to make abortion referrals, as some states have mandated.

Thomas Olp, Vice President and Senior Counsel for the Thomas More Society, reacted to the ruling in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra:

“We are pleased that the Supreme Court did as they should and upheld the First Amendment rights of pro-life counselors, doctors, and other medical personnel. California’s state law, like the one we’ve been fighting in Illinois, has illegally discriminated against them for their viewpoint and mandated speech, which is a clear violation of constitutionally guaranteed freedoms.”

Attorneys with the Thomas More Society had filed an amici curiae (friends of the court) brief in the case on behalf of 23 Illinois pregnancy centers in the National Institute of Family and Life Advocates lawsuit against California Attorney General Xavier Becerra.

Unlike California pregnancy centers, those in Illinois have been under court protection from the law that forces them to make referrals for abortion, even if they have sincerely held religious convictions against doing so. The preliminary injunction order was issued in July 2017 by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Rauner.

“The Illinois district court’s injunction is based on the Supreme Court’s well-established free speech principles, which were largely disregarded in the California case,” added Olp. “We are pleased that the high court has chosen to protect pro-life medical professionals from California’s Reproductive FACT Act. This unconstitutional and unethical mandate to promote the so-called ‘benefits’ of abortion and to refer women to abortion vendors has been a clear violation of the right of conscience of pro-life doctors, nurses, and pregnancy help centers.”

Nonprofit pro-life pregnancy centers are established to support and assist women by providing life-affirming alternatives to abortion, and the Thomas More Society brief argued that a woman has a right to choose life for her unborn child.

“Under the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment, these centers cannot be required to agree with or be compelled to promote any state’s message concerning abortion,” said Olp. “They have the right to offer charitable services and proclaim an exclusively pro-life message to those in need. The Supreme Court has now shut down laws like California’s Reproductive FACT Act and the amended Illinois Health Care Right of Conscience Act that deny women their ability to receive free pregnancy support and their right to choose life for their child.”

Like their California counterparts, the 23 Illinois pregnancy centers named in the brief work to ensure that women are not burdened by fear, financial concerns, or lack of information about their pregnancy. In 2017, the pregnancy resource centers represented by the Thomas More Society cumulatively provided more than 14,000 women free pregnancy services and support including free pregnancy tests, ultrasounds, parenting classes, baby clothes, and other material assistance.